Trading Case Study on NAS100: One Shot or Scale Into Resistance?

Trading Case Study

The Nasdaq 100 climbed about 500 points off Monday’s early low and now trades near 29,392, a little over 100 points under the first ceiling on our chart. Above it sit a second ceiling at 29,815 and last week’s high at 29,958, and Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon and Intel all report before Friday. With the Fed and big tech earnings in the same week, the range could stretch. So before any order fills, we compare three hypothetical ways to sell into that resistance and aim for last week’s low at 28,841: full size at 29,500, full size at 29,815, or half at each, with the same stop, the same target and the same risk.

In short: A better entry price raises reward-to-risk and lowers the win rate a plan needs to break even. Here that bar falls from about 44% at 29,500 to about 17% at 29,815. What the headline number leaves out is whether the order fills at all, and in which kind of week.

Please read this first
This article is a teaching example only. It is not trading or investment advice, and the trade plans below are not official BabyPips watchlist setups. We are not monitoring them, we will not update them, and we will not review how they turn out. Nothing in this article recommends a trade, and you should not copy these plans. Our honest advice to a newer trader is simple: do not trade these ideas. Use them only to see how an analyst compares trade structures before the fact. The prices and probabilities come from a simple model plus our own judgment, and both can be wrong. Stock indexes can jump on earnings news after the New York close, and leverage magnifies losses. Real trading requires your own research and your own risk plan based on your own individual risk tolerance, preferred style, and trading situation.

Where the Nasdaq Stands on Monday

Since early October, each rally has stopped lower than the last one: about 31,400 on October 6, 31,090 on October 12, 30,700 on October 14, 30,050 on October 16 and 29,958 last Wednesday. Thursday’s drop, as Meta and chip shares slid, and a dip on Friday morning took price to last week’s low of 28,841. A run of lower highs like this is one sign of a downtrend.

This week opened near 29,158. Price chopped between about 28,880 and 29,200 overnight, then jumped about 300 points in the 10 a.m. ET hour on Monday and trades near 29,392 as we write. The two purple lines above price are areas of interest, zones where the market has turned before: 29,500 (a level price turned at several times last week) and 29,815 (last Monday’s high). The question this case study asks is how a trader who wants to sell into resistance might build the position.

Volatility is rising. Over the last ten sessions, the index traveled about 590 points from high to low on an average day, up from about 420 points in the first week of October. The typical hourly move is about 68 points.

What Could Move It This Week

Our Fundies Cheat Sheet for October 26 to 30 gives big tech earnings their own lane (20%) and notes that Microsoft and Alphabet share Wednesday evening with the Fed. Here is the calendar (all times ET, four hours behind GMT this week):

The catalysts on the clock +Wednesday, 2:00 p.m.: Fed decision, press conference at 2:30 p.m. Futures put a hold near 90%, so Chair Warsh’s tone on December may matter more. +Wednesday, after the 4:00 p.m. close: Microsoft and Alphabet report, about two hours after the Fed. Their AI data center spending may show whether last Thursday’s chip selloff deepens or eases. +Thursday, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. core PCE inflation and third-quarter growth. +Thursday, after the close: Amazon and Intel report. Friday’s session carries the reaction, with no next day to confirm it.

The Cheat Sheet gives each of its six lanes a chance. We regrouped them into three teaching scenarios for the Nasdaq. The chances are editorial judgments built from the Cheat Sheet’s lanes, not forecasts:

Scenario	Chance	Built from the Cheat Sheet lanes	Push by Friday
1. Risk-off continues	45%	Weak tech results (8 of lane X’s 20 points), a firm Fed with rising yields (12 of A’s 16), oil fuel-cost drag (13 of W’s 26), a stock-led drop in yields (8 of B’s 15), quiet-Fed weeks that follow tech lower (4 of D’s 13)	About 375 points lower
2. Two-way chop	35%	Mixed tech results (3 of X), the rest of A (4) and W (13), quiet-Fed chop (5 of D), rate hikes abroad that stocks mostly ignore (all 10 of C)	No net push
3. Relief squeeze	20%	Tech results that ease AI-spending worries (9 of X), a softer Fed (7 of B), quiet-Fed weeks that follow tech higher (4 of D)	About 375 points higher

We set the 375-point push at one third of last week’s 1,117-point range, the same rule our WTI case study used. Blended, the three scenarios lean about 94 points lower by Friday, small next to a 590-point average day.

On paper, selling higher looks better. What that math quietly assumes is that every order fills, and that the trade ends at the stop or the target. Neither is guaranteed. A limit order hundreds of points above price may never trade, and a target at last week’s low may still be out of reach when Friday’s close ends the week.

So which plan really earns its reward-to-risk? Price sits near 29,392, about 108 points under 29,500 and 423 under 29,815, with the Fed and Microsoft and Alphabet results landing Wednesday. Whether the patient order fills in the weeks that help it, or the ones that hurt it, may decide the answer.

For Premium readers: the chart, the three plans, the scenario playouts, the odds each ceiling holds, the head-to-head scorecard and the expected value of all three plans continue below.